Questions on irony, paradox and metaphors fall under the category of figurative questions.
Essentially, what they require is for one to prove that one knows what these terms mean, in the context of the passage.
Thus, to answer such questions, one would need to
1) Fully understand the meaning of these terms
2) Link this understanding to the context of the passage
So, to address point 1), here’s a compilation of the definitions of these terms, as given by askoxford.com:
irony
• noun (pl. ironies) 1 the expression of meaning through the use of language which normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous effect. 2 a state of affairs that appears perversely contrary to what one expects.
To answer questions on irony:
1) State that it is ironic because <insert definition 1 or 2, as appropriate> (Note: This helps ensure that you pick out the right answer. However, typically, no marks are awarded for this statement.)
2) Show how this definition is applicable in the context of the passage (Note: This is typically where the mark gets awarded).
For example:
“One expects that <insert point from the passage that refers to the expected outcome>. However, in actual fact, <insert point from the passage that refers to the actual outcome>. Thus, the irony is in the fact that the expected outcome is contrary to the actual outcome.”
paradox
• noun 1 a seemingly absurd or self-contradictory statement or proposition that may in fact be true. 2 a person or thing that combines contradictory features or qualities.
To answer questions on paradox:
Show that you understand the idea of contradictory ideas coexisting.
1) State that it is a paradox because <insert definition 1 or 2, as appropriate> (Note: This helps ensure that you pick out the right answer. However, typically, no marks are awarded for this statement).
2) Show how this definition is applicable in the context of the passage (Note: This is typically where the mark gets awarded).
For example:
“<insert point from the passage> contradicts <name contradictory point from the passage>, because <state why points are contradictory / why one would not expect both points to be true at the same time / why one might expect the two points to be mutually exclusive>. Despite this, both <former point> and <latter point> are seen to occur. Thus, it is a paradox.”
Recent comments